GEM · AUGUST 2026 · EARLY WARNING

Paperclip Gem Vulnerability CVE-2026-77087: Early Warning

EARLY WARNING · UNCONFIRMED. This page describes a developing threat that 0Day surfaced from early signals and has not yet independently confirmed. Details may change. Always verify against the primary sources before acting.
Severity
CRITICAL
CVSS
9.6
Affected component
paperclip (gem)
Affected versions
>= 3.1.4, < 5.2.0 or >= 3.1.4, <= 3.1.4 or >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.0 or >= 3.2.1, <= 3.2.1 or >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.0 or >= 3.3.1, <= 3.3.1 or >= 3.4.0, <= 3.4.0 or >= 3.4.1, <= 3.4.1 or >= 3.4.2, <= 3.4.2 or >= 3.5.0, <= 3.5.0 or >= 3.5.1, <= 3.5.1 or >= 3.5.2, <= 3.5.2 or >= 3.5.3, <= 3.5.3 or >= 3.5.4, <= 3.5.4 or >= 4.0.0, <= 4.0.0 or >= 4.1.0, <= 4.1.0 or >= 4.1.1, <= 4.1.1 or >= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.0 or >= 4.2.1, <= 4.2.1 or >= 4.2.2, <= 4.2.2 or >= 4.2.3, <= 4.2.3 or >= 4.2.4, <= 4.2.4 or >= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.0 or >= 4.3.1, <= 4.3.1 or >= 4.3.2, <= 4.3.2 or >= 4.3.3, <= 4.3.3 or >= 4.3.4, <= 4.3.4 or >= 4.3.5, <= 4.3.5 or >= 4.3.6, <= 4.3.6 or >= 4.3.7, <= 4.3.7 or >= 5.0.0, <= 5.0.0 or >= 5.0.0.beta1, <= 5.0.0.beta1 or >= 5.0.0.beta2, <= 5.0.0.beta2 or >= 5.1.0, <= 5.1.0 or < 4.2.2 or >= 2.1.0, <= 2.1.0 or >= 2.1.2, <= 2.1.2 or >= 2.1.5, <= 2.1.5 or >= 2.2.0, <= 2.2.0 or >= 2.2.1, <= 2.2.1 or >= 2.2.2, <= 2.2.2 or >= 2.2.3, <= 2.2.3 or >= 2.2.4, <= 2.2.4 or >= 2.2.5, <= 2.2.5 or >= 2.2.6, <= 2.2.6 or >= 2.2.7, <= 2.2.7 or >= 2.2.8, <= 2.2.8 or >= 2.2.9.1, <= 2.2.9.1 or >= 2.2.9.2, <= 2.2.9.2 or >= 2.3.0, <= 2.3.0 or >= 2.3.1, <= 2.3.1 or >= 2.3.1.1, <= 2.3.1.1 or >= 2.3.10, <= 2.3.10 or >= 2.3.11, <= 2.3.11 or >= 2.3.12, <= 2.3.12 or >= 2.3.15, <= 2.3.15 or >= 2.3.16, <= 2.3.16 or >= 2.3.2, <= 2.3.2 or >= 2.3.3, <= 2.3.3 or >= 2.3.4, <= 2.3.4 or >= 2.3.5, <= 2.3.5 or >= 2.3.6, <= 2.3.6 or >= 2.3.7, <= 2.3.7 or >= 2.3.8, <= 2.3.8 or >= 2.3.9, <= 2.3.9 or >= 2.4.0, <= 2.4.0 or >= 2.4.1, <= 2.4.1 or >= 2.4.2, <= 2.4.2 or >= 2.4.3, <= 2.4.3 or >= 2.4.4, <= 2.4.4 or >= 2.4.5, <= 2.4.5 or >= 2.5.0, <= 2.5.0 or >= 2.5.1, <= 2.5.1 or >= 2.5.2, <= 2.5.2 or >= 2.6.0, <= 2.6.0 or >= 2.7.0, <= 2.7.0 or >= 2.7.1, <= 2.7.1 or >= 2.7.2, <= 2.7.2 or >= 2.7.4, <= 2.7.4 or >= 2.7.5, <= 2.7.5 or >= 2.8.0, <= 2.8.0 or >= 3.0.2, <= 3.0.2 or >= 3.0.3, <= 3.0.3 or >= 3.0.4, <= 3.0.4 or >= 3.1.0, <= 3.1.0 or >= 3.1.1, <= 3.1.1 or >= 3.1.2, <= 3.1.2 or >= 3.1.4, <= 3.1.4 or >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.0 or >= 3.2.1, <= 3.2.1 or >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.0 or >= 3.3.1, <= 3.3.1 or >= 3.4.0, <= 3.4.0 or >= 3.4.1, <= 3.4.1 or >= 3.4.2, <= 3.4.2 or >= 3.5.0, <= 3.5.0 or >= 3.5.1, <= 3.5.1 or >= 3.5.2, <= 3.5.2 or >= 3.5.3, <= 3.5.3 or >= 3.5.4, <= 3.5.4 or >= 4.0.0, <= 4.0.0 or >= 4.1.0, <= 4.1.0 or >= 4.1.1, <= 4.1.1 or >= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.0 or >= 4.2.1, <= 4.2.1
Patched version
0.3.1
CVE-2026-77087

An early warning has been issued for a critical vulnerability in the Paperclip gem, tracked as CVE-2026-77087. This vulnerability, which has a CVSS score of 9.6, could allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands via DNS rebinding.

What happened

Paperclip versions before 0.3.1, when run in default local_trusted mode, reportedly fail to validate Host headers. This failure allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands through DNS rebinding. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by a developer running Paperclip locally, uses DNS rebinding to make authenticated API requests and execute commands through the process adapter.

The vulnerability is under investigation and has not yet been exploited in the wild. The affected versions of Paperclip are extensive, covering a wide range of versions from 2.1.0 to 5.1.0, with specific exclusions noted in the threat data.

What to do about it

How 0Day would have caught this

MATCHED TO YOUR ACTUAL DEPENDENCY GRAPH0Day matches every incoming threat signal against your GitHub organization’s full dependency graph, including transitive dependencies. If paperclip is anywhere in your dependency tree, the engineers who own the affected repositories get a push alert the moment it is flagged — no manual audit to remember to run.

Read how this differs from waiting on a scanner to catch a known advisory, or see the exact, read-only access 0Day needs to do this for an organization.

Frequently asked questions

Am I affected?

You are affected if you are using Paperclip versions before 0.3.1 in default local_trusted mode.

What should I do right now?

Upgrade to Paperclip version 0.3.1 or higher immediately.

Has this vulnerability been exploited in the wild?

No, this vulnerability has not been exploited in the wild according to the current data.

Sources

Join the 0Day waitlist →

← Back to all threats